FIRM PARTNERS INTERVIEWING FOR IN HOUSE POSITIONS

By Adam Ramirez

FindLaw.com

March 23, 2011

Look around at your fellow GCs. There may be more former law firm partners in your midst this year.Experienced law firm partners are increasingly interviewing at big corporations, a New York legal consulting firm’s survey reports. Firm partners with significant experience were in particularly high demand last year.

Interviews of senior level lawyers spiked by nearly 20% between January 2010 and January 2011. Eolis International Group announced these findings in its January 2011 National Survey of Attorney Hiring Trends in Corporations.

Respondents cited a growing need for sophisticated expertise and administrative savvy in managing outside counsel relationships, according to the Eolis International Group press release. Some 40% of companies interviewing lawyers with ten or more years of law firm experience said they need sophisticated workers to streamline work farmed out to firms.

This jump wasn’t just confined to in-house positions, though. Thirty-eight percent of companies surveyed reported considering experienced attorneys for a wide range of positions, including quasi-legal and business roles.

“This news is especially encouraging for law firm partners who prefer who seek management positions as well as those who prefer substantive legal work delivered to them rather than responsibility for drumming up business,” Eolis CEO Wendeen Eolis said in the press release.

Some think the number should be even higher.

“I’m actually surprised the number is only 20 percent. In many people’s minds, the recession is coming to an end,” Nicky Mukerji, of Legalbill, told Corporate Counsel. As corporations are hiring, in-house legal departments “are trying to employ more professional and experienced lawyers who have been on the other side–who understand private practice.”

YOU ARE SO ATTRACTIVE! POLL FINDS LAW FIRM PARTNERS DESIRED FOR IN-HOUSE POSITIONS

By Shannon Green
Law.com

March 22, 2011

There was an increase in attorney interviews at big corporations last year, according to a recent survey by New York legal consulting firm Eolis International Group. And these weren’t cattle calls. Law firm partners with significant experience were in particularly high demand.

According to the national survey of attorney hiring trends in corporations, interviews of senior level lawyers jumped 20 percent between January 2010 and January 2011. A spokesperson for the consulting firm could not be reached for comment.

There was an increase in attorney interviews at big corporations last year, according to a recent survey by New York legal consulting firm Eolis International Group. And these weren’t cattle calls. Law firm partners with significant experience were in particularly high demand.

According to the national survey of attorney hiring trends in corporations, interviews of senior level lawyers jumped 20 percent between January 2010 and January 2011. A spokesperson for the consulting firm could not be reached for comment.

According to a press release, respondents cited a growing need for sophisticated expertise and administrative savvy in managing outside counsel relationships. Forty percent of companies interviewing lawyers with ten or more years of law firm experience said they need sophisticated workers to streamline work farmed out to firms.

But in-house positions weren’t the only jobs up for grabs at big corporations. Thirty-eight percent of companies surveyed reported considering experienced attorneys for a wide range of positions, including quasi-legal and business roles.

“This news is especially encouraging for law firm partners who prefer who seek management positions as well as those who prefer substantive legal work delivered to them rather than responsibility for drumming up business,” said Eolis CEO Wendeen Eolis in a press release.

Nicky Mukerji, for one, isn’t surprised by the poll results. “It’s something I would expect,” says Mukerji, director of business intelligence at Nashville-based Legalbill, a consulting and analysis firm that helps reduce legal spend. “I’m actually surprised the number is only 20 percent,” he adds.

“In many people’s minds, the recession is coming to an end,” says Mukerji. During the recession, corporations and firms engaged in significant relationship building usually brought on by the law firms, he says.

What we saw as a result is that corporations started becoming much more interested in managing cases, from both a legal and business standpoint. “This is all a very positive step in trying to bring the client and the law firm together,” says Mukerji.

Mukerji says that as the recession comes to an end and corporations are hiring, in-house legal departments “are trying to employ more professional and experienced lawyers who have been on the other side–who understand private practice.”

Through surviving the recession, law firm partners have developed a business management thought process, says Mukerji. Armed with both legal and business skills, he says, experienced partners are inherently attractive to a corporation’s general counsel, and in turn to the rest of the company.

In-house departments are in the process of trying to revamp their images, says Mukerji. Presenting hires with both legal and business experience sends a strong message to corporate executives and financial departments that law departments will be capable of handling all aspects of their caseloads.

WENDEEN EOLIS GAMING AWARDS FINALIST

By IGA Staff

Gaming-Awards.com

September 24, 2010

In September 2010, London-based Gaming Awards included Wendeen H. Eolis – the only gaming consultant from the United States to be honored with a nomination into this inner circle. Her behind-the-scenes legal consulting services to companies in the gaming space spans 40 years and clients on 5 continents.

The Nominees

Ozlem Moss – Xcellent Media
Janet Viippola – Interactive Gaming Council (IGC)
Nickie Shute – Take That Ltd.
Susan Thom – StanleyGenting UK
Andrea Murphy – Casino Review
Lois A. Rice, CAE – Colorado Gaming Association
Allison McCoy – Spectrum Gaming
Elizabeth Morone – Full Tilt Poker
Vanesa Cantt – Income Access
Ricki Koinig – bwin Interactive Entertainment AG
Teresa Tunstall – Gamcare
Ms Stephanie Cheung – Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
Laura Nolan – Inspire Gaming Group
Onika Russell – Ladbrokes
Anna Kos – Casinos Poland Ltd. Rookaya Saleem Fernandez – PartyGaming
Deirdre Curran – Parlay Entertainment Inc.
Wendeen H. Eolis – Wendeen Eolis Enterprises and Eolis Inernational Group
Shannon Bouschor – TribalNet, USA
Ewa Kwiatkowska – Unibet

The Finalists

Janet Viippola– Interactive Gaming Council (IGC)
Laura Nolan-Inspired Gaming Group
Ricki Koinig-Bwin Interactive Entertainment AG
Rookaya Saleem Fernandez-PartyGaming
Stephanie Cheung-Melco Crown Entertainment ltd
Teresa Tunstall-Gamcare
Wendeen H. Eolis – Wendeen Eolis Enterprises and Eolis Inernational Group

THE WINNERS IN THE BATTLE FOR I-GAMING … WILL BE…

By Monaco iGaming Staff

Live-Production.TV

August 31, 2010

The Monaco iGaming Exchanges, to be held in Monaco from 11 to 13 October 2010, has enhanced its conference program by adding an exclusive high level panel on the perspectives and evolution of the online gaming and betting market in the US.

The New York Times has recently posted: “Europe has opened the way to online gaming” as the US online gaming and betting market should open soon. That’s why the MiE has decided to create an opportunity for a gathering of the players and authorities from the US and European Markets through a panel: “The Winners in the Battle for I-Gaming in America will be…” on Monday 11 October from 16:30 to 18:00.

Prominent personalities have confirmed their participation on this panel:

– Commander Wendeen Eolis, Chairman and CEO of Eolis International Group, a legal and government affair consultancy with a prominent specialty in commercial and I-gaming issues. Commander Eolis has also served as a senior advisor to Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Governor George Pataki and as a consultant to four presidential administrations. This past year she produced a major white paper on the impact of the UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act) for submission to the White House. Commander Eolis expects Congress to approve regulated i-gaming in America in the near future, and she sees a “battle royale” for licenses looming on the horizon. She will be the moderator of the panel.

– Chuck Humphrey, an attorney specializing in gambling law matters, admitted to practice law in Colorado, Michigan and Texas. He is the author and Webmaster of Gambling-Law-US.com, a leading source for information on U.S. State and Federal gambling laws. In 1999 he became the principal investor in and one of the founders of the Tournament of Champions of Poker and the manager of Team Pegasus, an association of professional tournament poker players.

– Professor Nelson Rose is an internationally known scholar, writer and public speaker, and is recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on gaming law. Prof. Rose is co-author of Internet Gaming Law and Gaming Law: Cases and Materials, and co-editor-in-chief of the Gaming Law Review and Economics. Prof. Rose has testified as an expert witness and acted as a consultant to governments and industry in North America, Asia and Europe.

LITIGATORS FEEL THE PINCH, BUT NOT AS SEVERELY AS THEIR CORPORATE COLLEAGUES

By David Bario

American Lawyer.com

February 25, 2009

Last week the Litigation Daily wondered how the “Black Thursday” layoffs of Feb. 12 might have affected our readers, given litigation’s reputation as a safe haven for law firms in troubled times. We heard from a few firms that litigators had been laid off, albeit not in the same numbers as their corporate brethren.

But the news isn’t all bad: Legal search consultant (and poker champion) Wendeen Eolis reported the results of an informal survey suggesting, in Eolis’s words, that there is “more activity in litigation departments than meets the eye.” Thankfully, by “activity” Eolis means hiring, not layoffs.

In January, Eolis International Group surveyed 200 lawyers at 130 firms to find out what’s happening in litigation departments around the country. Eolis told us that at least 50 of the firms were looking to hire partners and associates with experience in securities litigation. “It’s not that litigation has suddenly ballooned,” Eolis said, “but there has been an uptick that is far broader than what has generally been assumed and what’s been reported on the blogs.”

Eolis said her survey revealed that firms–particularly non-New York firms–are bulking up their regulatory capabilities, especially when it comes to securities. (A tribute, perhaps, to the prosecutorial experience of new SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami?) “All that gearing up for additional regulatory work is happening in litigation departments more than in stand-alone departments, interdisciplinary groups, or in corporate departments,” Eolis told us.

Not surprisingly, Eolis’s survey registered a move among firms to shift underworked litigators to bankruptcy and restructuring work. In general, she found that litigators have felt the economic pinch less acutely than corporate lawyers, confirming what we’ve been hearing as well.  But she said there is a caveat: Litigation partners without a book of business are being warned not to rely on their corporate counterparts to send work their way. “Even though corporate departments are much more pressured than litigation departments at the vast majority of firms,” Eolis said, “the litigators are more pressured at the partner level if they don’t have independent clients.” In other words, time to polish up your rainmaking skills.

WENDEEN EOLIS SAYS 60 MINUTES HAS SET THE DATE

The highly anticipated 60 Minutes online poker story is set to air November 9th, according to Wendeen H. Eolis, a legal consultant and one of the best connected insiders in the poker industry.

Eolis, says, “60 Minutes is wrapping up critical pieces for the blockbuster program that spotlight cheating scams that were discovered over the past year at online poker sites, Absolute Poker and Ultimate Bet.”

Citing “impeccable sources,” Eolis reports, “This week’s game plan for the investigative team includes a visit to Las Vegas to reel in at least one more protagonist for a sizzling interview related to the Absolute Poker story and a full throttle effort to ‘catch up’ with Russ Hamilton, the 1994 WSOP Main Event Champion who is allegedly at the center of the Ultimate Bet scandal. “

In discussions with various gaming lawyers familiar with the development of the program, Eolis notes the general consensus: “Correspondent Steve Kroft will be very well positioned and hard hitting as he methodically peels the onion on every aspect of the scandals.”.

60 Minutes has interviewed a wide range of high profile player/ambassadors internet players-turned poker detectives and at least one poker media reporter who has served as a consultant on the project. Kroft is expected to applaud the dogged efforts of Internet players-turned poker detectives, in cracking the sinister cheating schemes and forcing Tokwiro and the regulators to take the matter seriously. It is not yet clear how much time will be allocated to the issue that unites many of the poker participants: support for legalized online gaming in an environment that is appropriately taxed and regulated.

PRO-CHOICE GOP WOMEN EMBRACING PRO-LIFE PALIN

By Ralph Z. Hallow

The Washington Times

August 30, 2008

Pro-choice Republican women, including one of their movement’s best-known leaders, have embraced the strongly pro-life Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as Sen. John McCain’s choice for running mate.  Somewhat surprisingly, Mrs. Palin has elicited enthusiasm not only from pro-choice Republican groups, but from many rank-and-file pro-choice Republican women.

Ann Stone, who founded Republicans for Choice in 1989 and has led it ever since, told The Washington Times that in picking Mrs. Palin, Mr. McCain did what he needed to do to make the Republican National Convention a success because Mrs. Palin will help the GOP ticket with pro-choice women.  “He did it on Friday. He picked a non-Washington fresh face, a woman who is totally out of the box,” Mrs. Stone said. “She breaks all kinds of stereotypes – if Republicans can overcome the lies that the Democrats are already spreading about her.”  “Do you think I have lost my mind to be excited over someone so anti-choice?” Mrs. Stone said. “Well, if Sarah Palin breaks through, it is great for all women. And the Democrats in the Senate will have to protect Roe vs. Wade, in spite of it all.”  She was referring to the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide and that abortion-rights advocates fear will be overturned by a more pro-life Supreme Court.

But the Palin pick is not a guaranteed winner for Mr. McCain.  “Palin is either an extraordinary political play or absolute suicide,” said pro-choice Republican Wendeen Eolis, former first assistant to George E. Pataki when he was New York governor and top adviser to Rudolph W. Giuliani when he was New York mayor.  One downside, she said, is that the Palin nomination will give Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton more reason to campaign seriously and sincerely for Democratic nominee Barack Obama, lest a McCain victory make Mrs. Palin the presumptive Republican nominee in 2012 or 2016 and jeopardize Mrs. Clinton’s position as the top female presidential prospect.  “Palin means that Hillary [Rodham Clinton] will be motivated and mobilized to campaign for Obama as she would not have been otherwise,” Ms. Eolis said. “The Clintons feel completely snubbed and insulted by the idea that anyone other that Hillary could go to the head of the class.”

Another pro-choice GOP organization expressed concern about the Palin pick, but did not dismiss her outright.  “As a mother with daughters in or entering the work force, I share the goal of promoting women to the highest levels of our government,” said Jennifer Blei Stockman, national chairwoman of the Republican Majority for Choice. “At the same time, we caution that the majority of voters are pro-choice and will be looking for signs that a McCain-Palin administration will put common sense ahead of politics.”

The 2008 Republican platform, expected to be formally adopted by the full convention meeting in St. Paul, Minn. on Monday, preserves the call for a constitutional ban on abortion that has been in the platform since 1980, to the consternation of groups like those headed by Mrs. Stone and Mrs. Stockman. They would rather have seen a pro-choice Republican, such as former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge or Mr. Giuliani, as Mr. McCain’s running mate.  “Recent polling confirms that a pro-choice vice president would have brought broader support to a GOP ticket. The GOP is not a single-issue party and is not monolithic on the issue of choice,” Mrs. Stockman said. “Even millions of pro-life Republicans believe strongly that reproductive choices must be left to women and families, not controlled by the government.”

“We hope that Senator McCain and Governor Palin take advantage of the opportunity before them to demonstrate to disaffected voters within our party and across the mainstream spectrum of independent and Democratic voters that the GOP is returning to the common-sense principles on which it was founded: belief in strong national security, fiscal responsibility, and individual freedom,” Mrs. Stockman said.

Susan Johnson, a Republican-leaning businesswoman in Winter Park, Fla., told The Washington Times that even though hers is a pro-choice Republican family, she was “brought to tears” watching Mrs. Palin give her first nationally televised speech in Dayton, Ohio, on Friday when Mr. McCain announced her as his choice for running mate.  “My husband and I were so touched and inspired by seeing and hearing this eloquent woman who opposes abortion and is on the ticket – you have to keep in mind I am a pro-choice Republican woman,” she said. “I find myself surprised that I am willing to compromise on something I feel so profoundly about.”  Noting that Mrs. Palin chose to carry to term and gave birth in April to a child in she knew beforehand had Down syndrome, Mrs. Johnson said, “I have a profoundly disabled child myself, and I am not sure I could make the decision she made to have that child and put her money where her mouth is as a pro-life woman.”

PLAYERS SHARPEN SKILLS WITH PRO POKER COACHES

By David Wade

WBZTV.com

April 11, 2008

You know poker is popular when Hollywood gets interested. The movie “21”, which follows some crafty card sharks from M.I.T, has been number one at the box office for the past two weeks.  Now players of all levels are looking for ways to improve their game. Hector Roman has hired a professional poker coach to help him sharpen his skills.  “I felt that having a coach in particular could customize my game to my strengths, and improve my weaknesses,” Roman said.  He now works with Wendeen Eolis, a tournament professional. She says she might “talk about one particular strategy. We might talk about conduct. We might talk about how to observe people.”

It’s easy to find poker coaches and classes online for as low as $20 a month, but prices might range from $50 to $500 an hour. Another option is something called poker boot camp, which can cost $1,600 for a two-day session.  Boot camp coach Linda Johnson says, “There are a lot of lectures. There are also a lot of live labs where the instructors deal to the students and critique their play. There’s a tournament.” Players who make this investment of time and money say it’s worth it, whether they are just starting out or refining their techniques. But the National Council on Problem Gambling worries that players are getting a false sense of security.

Keith Whyte says, “From our perspective, the majority of the outcomes of poker games are determined from chance, and that is something that no coach can improve.”  Another concern is that anyone can call themselves a coach. Eolis, who is vice chairman of the World Poker Association, says that players should be careful before hiring anyone. Steps to take include asking for references, verifying teaching experience, and checking credentials.She adds, “Do the reading, do the looking online, read the magazines, pay attention to the forums, and be ready to ask specific questions.”

The World Poker Tour Boot Camp will be at Foxwoods in the beginning of May. To find out more information, go to www.wptbootcamp.com.

(© MMVIII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

LEARNING HOW TO GET THAT POKER FACE

By KeyeTV Staff

keyetv.com

March 14, 2008

You get a coach for your basketball, tennis or golf game but what about for your poker game? With the skyrocketing popularity of poker – an estimated 60-million players in the US alone, it’s not surprising many are now turning to coaches to help give them an edge.  Looking to win big, more and more poker players are turning to coaches to boost their game.  Search online and you’ll find pages of self-proclaimed experts waiting to critique your play via cyberspace for about $20 a month. Or you can opt for a private, face-to-face instructor like Hector Roman did.  He says, “I felt that having a coach, in particular, could help to customize my game to my strengths and improve my weaknesses.”

Roman worked with coach Wendeen Eolis.  Eolis says, “We might talk about one particular strategy, we might talk about conduct, we might talk about how to observe people.”

Private sessions run from 50 to 500 bucks an hour. If the group approach is more your thing, weekend boot camps are packing ’em in. Typical cost: $1600 for two days of instruction.  Linda Johnson, World Poker Tour (WPT) boot camp coach, says, “A lot of lectures. There are also a lot of live labs where the instructors deal to the students and critique their play, there’s a tournament. ”  Participants say the trip is worth it, whether they’re just learning the ropes or perfecting their poker face.

The National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG), however, says the players’ main concern should be knowing their limits.  In terms of coaching, NCPG’s executive director Keith Whyte says, “From our perspective, the majority of the outcomes from poker games are determined by chance and that’s something that no coach can improve.”  But coaches say they see real results.  Johnson insists, “In the biggest tournament in the world, the biggest prize money in the world, two out of the final two tables were former boot camp students, so lots and lots of successes.”

Players who chose the boot camp run by the WPT are happy with their choice. Now it’s up to them.  Anyone can call themselves a coach, so Eolis who’s also vice-chairman of the World Poker Association, says be careful: ask for references – verify teaching experience, check credentials and do your homework.

(Copyright 2008, Four Points Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.)