PLAYERS SHARPEN SKILLS WITH PRO POKER COACHES

By David Wade

WBZTV.com

April 11, 2008

You know poker is popular when Hollywood gets interested. The movie “21”, which follows some crafty card sharks from M.I.T, has been number one at the box office for the past two weeks.  Now players of all levels are looking for ways to improve their game. Hector Roman has hired a professional poker coach to help him sharpen his skills.  “I felt that having a coach in particular could customize my game to my strengths, and improve my weaknesses,” Roman said.  He now works with Wendeen Eolis, a tournament professional. She says she might “talk about one particular strategy. We might talk about conduct. We might talk about how to observe people.”

It’s easy to find poker coaches and classes online for as low as $20 a month, but prices might range from $50 to $500 an hour. Another option is something called poker boot camp, which can cost $1,600 for a two-day session.  Boot camp coach Linda Johnson says, “There are a lot of lectures. There are also a lot of live labs where the instructors deal to the students and critique their play. There’s a tournament.” Players who make this investment of time and money say it’s worth it, whether they are just starting out or refining their techniques. But the National Council on Problem Gambling worries that players are getting a false sense of security.

Keith Whyte says, “From our perspective, the majority of the outcomes of poker games are determined from chance, and that is something that no coach can improve.”  Another concern is that anyone can call themselves a coach. Eolis, who is vice chairman of the World Poker Association, says that players should be careful before hiring anyone. Steps to take include asking for references, verifying teaching experience, and checking credentials.She adds, “Do the reading, do the looking online, read the magazines, pay attention to the forums, and be ready to ask specific questions.”

The World Poker Tour Boot Camp will be at Foxwoods in the beginning of May. To find out more information, go to www.wptbootcamp.com.

(© MMVIII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

LEARNING HOW TO GET THAT POKER FACE

By KeyeTV Staff

keyetv.com

March 14, 2008

You get a coach for your basketball, tennis or golf game but what about for your poker game? With the skyrocketing popularity of poker – an estimated 60-million players in the US alone, it’s not surprising many are now turning to coaches to help give them an edge.  Looking to win big, more and more poker players are turning to coaches to boost their game.  Search online and you’ll find pages of self-proclaimed experts waiting to critique your play via cyberspace for about $20 a month. Or you can opt for a private, face-to-face instructor like Hector Roman did.  He says, “I felt that having a coach, in particular, could help to customize my game to my strengths and improve my weaknesses.”

Roman worked with coach Wendeen Eolis.  Eolis says, “We might talk about one particular strategy, we might talk about conduct, we might talk about how to observe people.”

Private sessions run from 50 to 500 bucks an hour. If the group approach is more your thing, weekend boot camps are packing ’em in. Typical cost: $1600 for two days of instruction.  Linda Johnson, World Poker Tour (WPT) boot camp coach, says, “A lot of lectures. There are also a lot of live labs where the instructors deal to the students and critique their play, there’s a tournament. ”  Participants say the trip is worth it, whether they’re just learning the ropes or perfecting their poker face.

The National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG), however, says the players’ main concern should be knowing their limits.  In terms of coaching, NCPG’s executive director Keith Whyte says, “From our perspective, the majority of the outcomes from poker games are determined by chance and that’s something that no coach can improve.”  But coaches say they see real results.  Johnson insists, “In the biggest tournament in the world, the biggest prize money in the world, two out of the final two tables were former boot camp students, so lots and lots of successes.”

Players who chose the boot camp run by the WPT are happy with their choice. Now it’s up to them.  Anyone can call themselves a coach, so Eolis who’s also vice-chairman of the World Poker Association, says be careful: ask for references – verify teaching experience, check credentials and do your homework.

(Copyright 2008, Four Points Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.)

ABC 13 ACTION NEWS

By KTNV Staff

ABC 13 Action News (KTNV)

February 26, 2008

You get a coach to improve your tennis or golf game, so why not hire a coach to play better poker? Card games like Texas Hold ‘Em are sky rocketing in popularity, which is why more poker players are turning to a coach to get an extra edge.

Watch the Action Video (Wendeen Eolis is the featured one-on-one coach) to see more of what players are learning from coaches.

MAKING HISTOR-E

By Wendeen H. Eolis
All In Magazine

December 2007

NO SOONER THAN HARRAH’S ANNOUNCED IT had acquired London Cubs International (LCI) in late-2006, World Series of Poker Commissioner Jeffrey Pollack and his WSOP team hit the ground running with a bold plan in mind.

The forward-thinking marketing group of Pollack, Ty Stewart, Gary Thompson, and Craig Abrahams was poised to set down stakes for a spectacular poker event to show off the art and drama of the WSOP outside the United States.

The first meeting between WSOP and LCI executives was held at LCI’s headquarters in London a mere three days after the Harrah’s announcement. Accompanied by Abrahams, Commissioner Pollack opened discussions for a grand World Series of Poker Europe (WSOPE) event in London.

***
In September, the inaugural WSOPE, presented by Betfair.com, played to its thunderbolt conclusion at LCI’s flagship property, Casino at the Empire, on a poker stage that was fittingly a stone’s throw from the grand art of London’s National Gallery in the heart of the city’s venerable Theatre District. Even the group of creative thinkers that make up the WSOP’s marketing team could not have dreamed up the triple-barreled, record-setting performance of Norwegian player Annette Obrestad. More than 150 reporters from all over the world took notice of her astonishing play in the final event and have embraced her as the new media darling of the poker world. So has sponsor Betfair, which signed a deal with her to represent the company,even before her extraordinary victory.

Hours before her 19th birthday, Obrestad won the main event of the inaugural WSOPE, a £10,000 ($20,137) buy-in event that yielded a £1,000,000 ($2,013,734) first-place prize for her. Obrestad bested 362 players in a field of talent that included many of the most accomplished and seasoned players in the world. The likes of Doyle Brunson, Phil Hellmuth, Johnny Chan, David “Devilfish” Ulliot, Marcel Luske, and Gus Hansen were all part of the starting list. Obrestad had her work carved out for her.

In one fell swoop, Obrestad permanently destroyed any vestiges of a felt ceiling over the heads of female players, while also crushing the hopes of a large contingent of visiting American poker pros. Obrestad was the talk of the tables from the beginning to the end. A known quantity on the Internet, she was the new girl in town when she knocked out Jennifer Harman. She became the one to watch even before she took out Annie Duke.

Obrestad moved up the ladder passing every other male marquee player in her quest to reach the final table. With the departure of Hansen in 10th place, there were no more big-name live-tournament players to kick around anymore. After a grueling series of battles, Obrestad’s set of sevens overpowered John Tabatabai’s two pair, sending the young Englishman to the rail in second place. Obrestad raised her hand as the heavyweight champion of poker in Europe with a million pounds weighing her down.

Both Obrestad and Tabatabai were learned veterans of Internet card room competition. Their performances reflect ample proof that cyberspace offers an incomparable, fast-track training ground for young poker players. Obrestad had reportedly scored hundreds of thousands of dollars of winnings in online tournaments,against large fields of players that spanned six continents from America to Australia,prior to taking her seat at the WSOPE main event. Commissioner Pollack commented about Obrestad’s win: “It is a great message about the power of women poker players, and she clearly represents the new generation.”

***
At 18, Obrestad was of legal age to compete at Harrah’s London-based venue. Her highly publicized win, nevertheless, created a double-edged sword for Harrah’s. The American-headquartered company offers all of its other poker events across the United States, where the legal age to gamble is 21.
Her win put a brilliant spotlight on the WSOP brand in Europe, but from now until September 2009, she will not be able to journey to any of the WSOP Circuit Events, nor will she be eligible to participate in the fabled Las Vegas-based original WSOP. The World Series is the richest and most prestigious poker event on the planet. ALL IN asked Commissioner Pollack (who prefers to be called Jeffrey by friends, colleagues, and players he has met), “How does Obrestad’s win affect the image of Harrah’s and its responsibility to young people?” He responded, “Harrah’s is committed to responsible gaming in every market in which we operate. The legal age for gaming in the United Kingdom is 18, so Annette was welcomed to enter the tournament and we proudly crowned her champion. In the United States, however, the legal age is 21, so she has a couple of more years to go before she can experience the WSOP in Las Vegas.”

The conflict between the legal age to gamble in the U.K. and the U.S. did not impede Obrestad’s negotiations for a sponsorship deal with several European online poker sites in the weeks leading up to the WSOPE. Betfair was the successful suitor, picking up the wunderkind as its poker ambassador and as part of the Betfair Pro Poker Team. The U.K.’s largest online betting company announced its coup before her play at the final table, noting that it was her previously proven poker skills and personality that interested the company, without regard to the outcome of her final table appearance at the WSOPE.

How sweet it was, both for Obrestad and Betfair, to add to her resume in the WSOPE finale. Under the bright lights of television and in the presence of reporters from around the world, Obrestad expressed pride in her new association with Betfair and displayed humility about her history-making win, proving Betfair’s assessment on the money. Betfair also made a deal with Thomas “Buzzer” Bihl, who won the opening £2,500 pound H.O.R.S.E. event to become the first player in history to win a WSOP bracelet beyond American shoes.

***
If not for the marketing genius of the WSOP team that brought its product to Europe, Obrestad might still be branded as a Norwegian poker prodigy. Instead, she will be known henceforth as the European queen who beat the worldly kings of poker. The story of her historic WSOPE Championship performance is part of another story: Harrah’s decision to rev up the marketing engine of the WSOP brand.

In August 2005, Pollack joined Harrah’s as vice president of sports and entertainment. The two-time Emmy Award winning media and sports executive had previously been managing director of broadcasting and new media for NASCAR, where he led the use of advanced media and the newest technologies to increase fan accessibility. He also helped direct NASCAR’s network television partnerships and spearheaded NASCAR’s season-launch marketing efforts. As executive producer of NASCAR IN CAR, he received a 2003 Primetime Emmy for outstanding achievement in interactive television programming and garnered a 2004 Sports Emmy for outstanding innovative technical achievement. In 2004, he was honored with the first-ever Billboard Digital Entertainment Award for best interactive television programming.

Pollack was a natural to lead the way for Harrah’s in extending the WSOP brand worldwide. In January ’06, the formal role and title of commissioner was added to his initial responsibilities. “I have always been attracted to opportunities to do things that haven’t been done before, and it was obvious there were lots of opportunities here,” he explained when asked what about the new post appealed to him. He described his plans as follows: “to essentially modernize a 38-year-old brand that has rich traditions and heritage.” He added, “The job has been what I expected it to be, and more “all of it good.”

The commissioner also explained how the additional title came about. “Harrah’s management decided, given the nature of the work that needed to be done and our desire to further establish the WSOP as a leader and innovator, it made sense to hold one person publicly accountable–on the line when things go wrong.” Jeffrey sees the most significant mandates of his job as “community building and accountability.”

Immediately upon his arrival at Harrah’s, Pollack started to work the phones, reaching out to top players and others with longtime experience at the WSOP. He didn’t shirk from hearing or addressing complaints. The outgrowth of his listening tour was the creation of the Players Advisory Council (PAC). The concept of a player sounding board and a cooperative discussion group between players and Harrah’s WSOP executive staff worked so well that the group has evolved from a half-dozen players at its inception to 16 players today. “The PAC has had an enormous and invaluable impact on the WSOP,” Pollack observed.

“When we started, I thought we would meet two or three times a year and that would be it. The interaction and dialogue is year-round, and even weekly. There hasn’t been a major decision made about the WSOP in the last year in which the PAC hasn’t had an opportunity to weigh in on operations structures and other matters. Each member comes with different perspective and cares deeply about the WSOP. What is so special about the Council is they are open forums and every perspective is encouraged.” The PAC has worked so well that last spring Jeffrey decided to expand the concept for international players (called the “IPAC”), as the WSOP team readied to roll out the 2007 World Series and the WSOPE in rapid-fire succession.

Full disclosure: Early last spring, Jeffrey sat me down and proposed that I help organize such a group. Over lunch he reminded me, as he had in other more casual conversations, “Customer issues are immensely important in the scheme of growing both the WSOP and WSOPE brands. So much of my job is about listening, diplomacy, finding a way for people to understand each other. Getting to know your constituency is very important.”

Jeffrey Pollack is not afraid to talk to people with different views; he actually seems to enjoy the challenge of turning around people who are critical. Ask noted pro Steve Zolotow, who upon meeting Jeffrey was more interested in securing his boss’ telephone number to complain about him than in listening to the commissioner’s excuses for the long WSOP registration lines and the new playing cards that had been introduced without adequate testing of suitability. A week later, Pollack and Zolotow had a lunch meeting. Steve has since joined PAC.

Long before meeting up with Zolotow, however, Jeffrey Pollack recognized there was much to do to enhance the image of the WSOP and extend the brand. It was no surprise that immediately upon assuming his position at Harrah’s, Jeffrey assembled a highly credentialed, hard-charging team to consider, modify, and expand on the vision for extending the WSOP brand.

Gary Thompson, a longtime Harrah’s communications executive with a love for our game was already overseeing communications issues for the WSOP. Jeffrey quickly counted the blessings of having Thompson in the mix. Pollack also scored a touchdown in hiring his longtime friend Ty Stewart, who previously had a seven-year stint with the NFL in creative sports marketing. He joined Harrah’s as director of sponsorship and licensing. Craig Abrahams came aboard the WSOP team as director of broadcasting and new media after serving as an intern with Harrah’s the previous summer. The freshly minted Harvard Business School graduate had impressed one and all at Harrah’s throughout his internship, so Pollack scooped him up quickly. The blended experience of Pollack’s team produced the ideal think tank required to bring the WSOPE concept to life.

Jeffrey applauds everyone on the WSOP team, going beyond the front line of his marketing team to include all those that have paved the way for the possibility of a WSOPE through their significant contributions. He made special note of Howard Greenbaum, Geno Iafrate, and Joe Scibetta. He added more praise for the yeoman efforts of “hundreds of others at the Rio and throughout our company. Without these fine people, the business doesn’t work. Their expertise and passion make a big difference every day.”

Continuing to extol his praises for the people he works with, Pollack said, “In the instance of the WSOPE, Ty and Craig really led the charge with an incredible assist from Angele Marshall. Jack Effel, Gary, and I really showed up after the hard work had been done.” Jeffrey is never satisfied with merely rattling off a few deserved acknowledgments. He wants us to appreciate, as fully as he does, the value of others’ contributions,high level colleagues and critical supporting casts alike.

“Ty is simply one of the most creative sports marketers I’ve ever met,” he continued. “Craig is an analytic genius.” He called Thompson his consigliere and “the voice of experience and wisdom at every turn.” He continued, “Jack does a masterful job pulling together the tournament operations and helped us immeasurably in making the transition from Las Vegas to London.” He said of Angele Marshall, who had been based in London with LCI prior to the Harrah’s acquisition of the British gaming company, “She is an incredibly gifted, young event coordinator who has launched her career with the WSOP in grand style.”

While Laura Tibbs operates mostly behind the scenes, the commissioner wanted to insure that every top player and every customer knows that “Laura is the heartbeat of our team.”A dedicated assistant to Jeffrey and the entire team, Tibbs also helps manage player relations and coordinates everything with PAC and IPAC.

Given his credo, “Good ideas belong to the team; bad ones are my fault,” it is no wonder that he credits the idea for the recently concluded WSOPE as the brainchild of an exuberant team that developed its strategic marketing plan with gusto. He said, “We started thinking and talking about WSOP events outside of the U.S. in late 2005, really when I got to Harrah’s. We’d been exploring doing something in Europe for just about all of 2006, and when we acquired LCI, that accelerated our thinking and our plans.” Once Harrah’s was set to purchase London Clubs, “It was easy to decide to stage an event, it was just a question of when.” The rest is history.

***
In addition to becoming the youngest player ever to win a WSOP bracelet event, Annette Obrestad also eclipsed Annie Duke’s single-event women’s record for earnings, as Duke won $2,000,000 in the 2004 Tournament of Champions. Duke tipped her hat to Obrestad after the event, commenting that she had been seated to the left of this cool-as-a cucumber opponent during part of the tournament and never wanted to face that challenge again.

By anyone’s standards, Obrestad’s achievement is genuinely awesome, particularly in light of the stiff competition she faced in the main event of the WSOPE. From WSOP world champions Jamie Gold, Chris “Jesus” Ferguson, and Greg Raymer to fellow Norwegian Thor Hansen, Obrestad was surrounded by the best of the best, including perhaps the premier all-around female poker player in the world, Jennifer Harman.

Like Obrestad, Harman is petite and known to be lethal at the poker tables. She has won millions of dollars in a single session at the Big Game in Las Vegas as well as two WSOP bracelets. In the opening event of the WSOPE, a £2,500 H.O.R.S.E. event, Harman cruised from the starting gate to the final table, where she accumulated a massive chip lead. She could almost taste a historic win. But a sudden reversal of fortune turned into a downspin. She landed with a second-place finish in the maiden WSOPE competition, while Thomas Bihl of Germany became the first player in the history of WSOP competition to earn a bracelet outside the United States. At the end of a 13-hour final table, Bihl, a four-year pro, showed the power of discipline, desire, and determination at the poker table to win £70,875, or about $141,000.

Between the hoopla of the opening H.O.R.S.E event and far more hoopla at the finale, the WSOPE rolled out a £5,000 Pot-Limit Omaha competition. Until the recent No-Limit Hold ‘Em craze, Pot-Limit Omaha had been the predominant game of choice in the major poker centers of the U.K. for decades.
As it was in the other two tournaments, so it was here,young Europeans rose to the top, with Italy’s 23-year-old Dario Alioto finishing first for £234,390 and Istvan Novak of Hungary taking second place to go home with £137,280. Americans Ted Forrest and Andy Bloch went deep into the tournament, pushing their way to the final two tables.

While the WSOPE did not see the kinds of numbers or the frenzy that invariably marks modern-day WSOP tournament affairs in Las Vegas, the WSOPE was a definite hit with the European players and is a surefire bet to become a tradition. Pollack, who never really feared throwing a party in an empty room, said, “We are very pleased with the turnout. It is never about quantity; it is about quality.”
During the WSOPE, Pollack and the rest of his team often held meetings and chatted up players in a restaurant overlooking the proceedings. The constant and boundless work required to strengthen the WSOP brand is evident in the efforts of a lot of folks, but it is the team of Pollack, Thompson, Stewart, Abrahams, and Marshall that stood out most here. Their quest to extend the WSOPE brand is unmistakable. Like Bihl, Alioto, and Obrestad of 2007 WSOPE fame, the WSOP team is a group of doers who will not be denied.

***
The WSOPE is over. But Pollack still has a few thank yous to extend. He cited sponsor Betfair as a “world class company with a similar DNA to ours,” and offered a few more final words of praise for others: “Launching a new venture and brand extension like we did is no easy task, but,thanks to the good folks at LCI and our terrific sponsors at Betfair,we all did it as one team with style, success, and impact. They helped make poker history and do what many thought could not be done.
“And, they tolerated our invasion with a smile,” the commissioner added. “We’re proud to call them colleagues and hope they welcome us back.”

FAME AND CELEBRITY

By Gary Wise
ESPN Poker
July 7, 2007

Well, Phil Hellmuth is leaving the 2007 World Series of Poker with sole possession of the all-time bracelet record. On Thursday, Phil was inducted to the Hall of Fame, speaking eloquently about his love for the two men he used to be tied with, Johnny Chan and Doyle Brunson. Now, he’ll have to be content in the knowledge they’ll stay the men he used to be tied with.

Brunson and Chan both busted early on Day 1A. Brunson did the unthinkable, showing up late for the event of which he used to say “The worst day of the year is the day you bust from the main event.” It’s indicative of a growing trend in Doyle’s attitude towards tournaments. He just hasn’t brought the passion he did before the Safe Port Act passed, rendering moot a lot of the efforts he’d made over the previous thirty years to make the game respectable.

Chan’s exit was equally passionless. Just seven hours into play, he got caught making a vain move in an attempt to build a stack that had been reduced to just 20 percent of what he started with. Chan, once the most dominant player in the game, has been a shadow of his former self this year as he’s tried to re-equalize the lifetime bracelet race.

For Hellmuth, sole possession of the record is a mixed blessing. “When I’m done, I want to be remembered as the greatest player of all-time. For me, that means winning more bracelets than anyone.” He’s done just that, but in leaving Brunson and Chan in the dust, he’s put an end to the greatest drama the Series faced coming into this edition.

Hellmuth, for all of his faults, is a savvy man. He knows that being associated with Chan and Brunson is good for him as far as attention and the endorsements it can bring. Before the Series, he told me in earnest “I’d rather Doyle and Johnny win bracelets while I don’t than none of us winning one.” He felt that way because of his respect for the history of the game and the way it would maintain the discussion of the game’s brightest record. Now, having not yet played a hand in the biggest tournament of the year, he’s guaranteed sole possession of the record. Is it possible that No. 11 was anti-climactic?

The WSOP Poker Hall of Fame doesn’t operate the way in the same way as other games. There’s no sportswriter vote. Instead, the selection process is private and the honor is used to educate the masses by recognizing pioneers. Some bitter onlookers have called it “The Hall of Shame” because of the tactics many of the members utilized to achieve victory, but I prefer to look at the Hall as a way of enshrining the past and celebrating the evolution of the game from outlaw activity to prime-time competition.

Hellmuth wasn’t the only player enshrined this year. Joining him on stage was Barbara Enright, a lady forgotten by the fast-paced television age that insists on its lady players being young and attractive. Enright was a pioneer deserving of the honor for the things she did before any other woman did in a time where the lady players weren’t always as accepted as now.

I didn’t get to talk to Barbara after the induction, but I got a moment with Max Shapiro. “We’re as close as any married couple.” The veteran poker player, writer and humorist told me. “We’re life partners. Soul mates.”

Shapiro detailed the bullet points of Enright’s career. She was the first woman to win the ladies event at the World Series of Poker twice, taking the title first in 1986, then in 1994. The ’94 win culminated wHAT may have been the strongest two-year stretch any woman has enjoyed in tournament play. The next year, Enright became the first (and thus far, only) woman to make the final table of the main event, only getting knocked out when Brent Carter’s 6-3 off-suit felled her pocket queens. The year after that, she became the first woman to win an open-event bracelet.

While Hellmuth is obviously the more glamorous choice, and the one that will be remembered longer, Enright’s is a selection in the honor of Suzie Isaacs, Wendeen Eolis, Betty Carey and the other women who played the game before it was the sociable thing to do. These women endured crass chauvinism the likes of which would launch a thousand lawsuits in this day and age. Paving the way for a new generation of pros like Annie Duke and Jen Harman, and a newer generation of female phenoms like Anna Wroblewski and Vanessa Selbst. On behalf of every woman who’s ever played a hand and every guy who’s gotten a date at the poker table, we owe them a debt of gratitude. This is the beginning of that payment.

One thing I’m really enjoying about the Darfur event aftermath is the number of celebrities who have parlayed the experience into a main-event entry. Guys like Ray Romano, Brad Garrett and Tobey Maguire came out to support the cause, and then figured “Why not put up the extra ten grand?” , must be nice.

Thing is, the celebs only enhance the special feeling this tournament inspires above all others, and they always have. Back in the seventies, it was Gabe Kaplan and Jimmy “The Greek” Snyder. Then, the eighties produced a number of Telly Savalas appearances. In the nineties, there was Dick Van Patten and Wilford Brimley. Now, there are a lot more names with a lot of punch to them.

Why? Well, obviously, the social acceptability of the thing, but I also give credence to the reduced entry fee. Sure, it’s still $10,000 to enter, but it’s sure not the same $10,000 it was in 1970. Top that off with today’s celebrities making a lot more than their yesteryear counterparts and the increased mobility technology has provided and you’ve got celebrities playing in the biggest event of the year.

While sitting in the media room tonight, I was greeted by Norm MacDonald (we spent some time talking poker last year), who introduced me to his friend Sam Simon. I didn’t recognize Simon’s name right away, but he was the co-creator of The Simpsons, no small deal. After the initial awkwardness of my not immediately recognizing his social importance, Sam and I started talking poker. That’s when it dawned on me that we were just two guys brought together by the game. It’s amazing, the relationships that can be spawned over a deck of cards.

BERKLEY/PORTER BILL ATTRACTS SOME 60 CO-SPONSORS

By Wendeen H. Eolis
Poker Player Newspaper

Mr. Frank has barely left the podium announcing his own Internet Gambling bill which is designed to attack the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act which was passed late last year. Ms. Berkley and Mr. Porter were among Mr. Frank’s near dozen co-sponsors last week.

The Nevada duo, Berkley and Porter, are co-chairs of the Congressional Gaming Caucus. Prior to submitting their bill, they proved to be very effective in building support on both sides of the aisle for the study bill, garnering thus far some 60 co-sponsors for their proposed legislation.

Congresswoman Berkley talked to me at length shortly before the introduction of the Study bill, explaining its appeal, regardless of how her colleagues previously voted last year on the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. She insists that everyone in Congress should support getting the facts right and focus on understanding this business which has grown into a multi-billion dollar industry around the world in just a few short years.

She says the study will be conducted by the independent and highly regarded National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Her office has offered as part of a public statement, “It will be the basis for a report to lawmakers on a wide range of issues that involve Internet gaming, including advances in technology, regulation in other countries, and the impact of the current federal on-line gambling ban in the United States.”

PPA President Michael Bolcerek, spoke to me this afternoon to confirm that PPA considers the Study bill to be positive in so far as “it moves the needle in the right direction” but emphasizes that “his group would like it to move faster and thinks that it can.”

As I reported several weeks ago, I can now confirm that the Berkley/Porter Study bill will be referred to the Judiciary Committee and other committees are likely to get into the fray in the near future. Stay tuned for my further assessment of the bill after my next discussion with her scheduled for later today…

Wendeen Eolis advises commercial and online gaming companies as part of her legal business/ contract negotiations consulting practices. She currently serves as Vice-Chair of the World Poker Association and chairs its Government Relations Committee. Ms. Eolis is also an internationally recognized tournament poker player; she was elected to the WPT’s Inaugural Professional Poker Tour and has cashed in five WSOP events. Her published articles are read in poker and legal journals Visit eolis.com for info on her upcoming manual, Secrets of the People Reader. This article is an adaptation of material that may be part of Ms. Eolis’ forthcoming book, Power Poker Dame.

THE BIG GAME IS ONLINE

By Wendeen H. Eolis
Poker Player Newspaper

May 3, 2007

The deed has been done. Congressman Barney Frank (MA) has introduced the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act (IGREA) of 2007 into the United States House of Representatives. IGREA is a cleverly constructed piece of legislation.

IGREA is an innovative frontal assault on UIGEA

Representative Frank attacks the pertinent portions of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) without any attempt to repeal it. He focuses on the issue of credit cards for online gambling payments—a matter that falls squarely within the control of the Financial Services Committee’s portfolio. And he offers up his own plan for the future of online gaming with provisions for licensing and regulating it.

The Congressman recently summarized his decision to carry the IGREA flag, explaining, “I spend a lot of time worrying about how to protect people from others, but I have no more time to worry about protecting people from themselves.”

Poker players’ voices are rising

Michael Bolcerek, President of the Poker Players Alliance, applauds Frank’s legislation. He crows, “We are very excited about this bill.” Bolcerek claims his association has 442,000 + members, and he anticipates attracting another fifty thousand within a matter of weeks. Of late, Mr. Frank appears to be impressed with the potential political power of online poker players.

A few short weeks ago, the Massachusetts Senator made a public point of shunning any collaboration on his bill with the online poker industry, and in particular with PPA Chairman, former Senator Alfonse D’Amato. During that same period, he noted that he would not consider a specific poker carve out in his legislation, explaining he was not persuaded of any reason to distinguish poker from blackjack.

This week, however a seemingly more enlightened Frank has seen fit to make repeated public references to the mushrooming resentment of American-based poker players over government efforts to crush online gaming by American residents. Two days ago, in an interview on National Public Radio, he told his listeners that there are a lot of poker players out there who are angered by the bureaucratic attempts to deprive them of the right to choose a little Texas Hold’em after dinner—from the comfort of a cyberspace seat in their homes.

In comments following his press conference last Thursday, Mr. Frank also showed a grasp of the swelling grassroots movement among poker players across the country. He suggested that poker players may not be known for having gone to the polls before, but predicts that next time around, they will be there in droves, ready to pull the voting lever likeliest to take anti-gambling politicians down.

IGREA is on a slow track

While Frank’s recent comments are heartwarming in the online poker community, his commitment to working toward passage of this bill, is hardly set in stone. Last week while in Brussels, he highlighted this point after meeting with European Union Commissioner for Internal Market and Services, Charlie McCreevy. Mr. Frank said that part of the purpose of his bill is to test the level of support for it, but that no major victory was likely any time soon. He added that his bill is not focused on the broader issues raised by recent World Trade Organization rulings. He said, “My committee only has jurisdiction over credit cards.”

Representative Frank’s narrowly bounded tour de force has been an obvious labor of love and drama during the past several weeks. IGREA of 2007 addresses several issues of varying merit that are raised by anti-gambling groups: potential money laundering, gambling addiction and perhaps most heatedly, as of late, underage gambling at online poker sites.

Mr. Frank noted in his press conference last Thursday, in addition to an enforcement framework, with provisions to license and regulate online gambling, there are also appropriate opt-outs available to individual states, Indian tribes, and sports leagues.

Gambling law expert Chuck Humphrey offers insights

Gambling law expert Chuck Humphrey comments on the new bill as follows: “The Frank bill brings two improvements to the online gambling arena: It creates a licensing authority for online gaming operators that applies on a nationwide, rather than a state-by-state basis and it solves the conundrum created in last year’s Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of legal online gaming being able to be conducted only in a single state at any one time.” Humphrey added, “The present text of the bill has some significant internal inconsistencies and apparent oversights that will need to be corrected in Congressional committee sessions. One such example; states can opt out of allowing a licensed operator to offer online gaming to its residents. But, it is not clear whether the test is that a state must specifically permit one or more forms of online gambling or whether the only requirement is that a state not have a law specifically prohibiting a given form of online gaming.”

Where is D’Amato?

The gambling industry’s generally high-kicking celebration of the Frank bill is not necessarily universal, however. Even within the increasingly united ranks of the online poker world, at least one high-profile online poker entrepreneur is reserved about Frank’s proposed legislation. He says, “With only 11 states in which private sector gambling is legal, I’m not sure that in the end we will get very far, if states have an opt-out provision.”

Mr. D’Amato, who is leading the charge as the PPA’s chairman and chief flak, has been a man of few public words lately, giving little more than polite lip service and serving up nice platitudes to the Frank bill. He has said, “It’s a common sense approach.” From inside the Beltway, comes word that D’Amato and the PPA may be more excited about Florida Representative Robert Wexler’s imminent plans to submit a poker carve-out bill.

If D’Amato helps to get the UIGEA undone, not only does he complete his mission for the PPA, but he also stands to earn a “knock your socks off” bonus directly from some online operators—according to a big player in the off shore online poker business.

Frank is center stage

For the moment, Frank has put IGREA in the spotlight, and he is basking in the attention it brings on his civil libertarian views. He seems to be unconcerned about all that is going on in the wings.

For example, so far, Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid appears to be standing pat, signaling continued support for just one piece of gambling legislation-a study bill that is slated for introduction by Nevada Representative Shelley Berkley next week. Representative Berkley’s anticipated bill may come almost directly on the heels of Frank’s bill; it is unclear as to whether or not it will steal some of Barney Frank’s thunder. And then there are the increasingly audible rumblings emanating from Mr. Wexler’s office, where the friendliest bill to poker may be gestating.

Both Ms. Berkley and Mr. Wexler are among the 11 co-sponsors of Frank’s bill. According to the spokesperson for the American Ganing Association, high profile casino leaders are taking a hard look at the Frank legislation this week. Mr. Frank is certainly having a bright moment in the sun.

Berkley stands tall

Yesterday I caught up with Shelley Berkley over lunch. We both chose sushi. It was a Dutch treat deal with her on a cell phone in Las Vegas and I on my mobile in New York. We talked about the week that was in online gaming quarters.

Ms. Berkley had not made it to Frank’s press conference in Washington, but she was totally in the loop on the day’s activities and the events that led up to her and her colleagues’ decisions to line up as co-sponsors of the IGREA bill. She said, “I am cautiously optimistic about it.”

“Can the PPA play a positive role here?” I inquired. She warned that the PPA members must come out in force and make their voices heard with their representatives. “Is D’Amato an asset in the process?” I then asked. She moved the conversation away from D’Amato, but offered more generally, “It is the PPA membership, in a compelling grass roots movement of its own, more than lobbyists, who will create the real prospect of victory in this fight.”

We returned to the subject of the Frank bill. The Congresswoman praises his effort “to ignite the debate” that should have taken place before UIGEA was considered for a vote last year.

Robert Wexler is at stage right

Online poker players are still hopeful of a fast and complete rescue—in an unfettered poker carve-out from UIGEA; one that excludes poker from any gambling prohibitions, by treating it as a game of skill. This is the road that Representative Wexler is reportedly poised to travel. Passage of a bill based on this strategy is a near-term long shot according to most everyone’s calculations on the Hill. But the jury is still out as to who is whistling Dixie and who will actually make headway in Congress with favorable online gambling legislation this year.

TARGETED ATTACK ON UIGEA TO BE LAUNCHED IN APRIL

By Wendeen H. Eolis
Poker Player Newspaper

March 28, 2007

Reciting part of Henry Wadsworth Longefellow’s poem the Midnight Ride of Paul Revere, Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank stopped short of telling me when he would gear up for an attack on the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA).

I figured it out remembering additional verse from Longfellow’s memorable words: “on the 18th of April in Seventy-five.” He let me know I was on track with the April 18th target date to get cracking in the halls of Congress, explaining that the legislators would all be back in Washington after a two-week recess.

Congressman Frank seeks relief, now

Congressman Barney Frank assured me he will get beyond mere rhetoric and move swiftly against the “stupid” provisions of the UIGEA, which attempts to end online betting by American-based players. He has previously called the recent legislation one of the stupidest laws ever passed. Now he is fully focused on its affront to any freedom-loving citizen. This latter point makes him see red. It bodes well for online and commercial gaming interests who need a powerful advocate in the thick of the political maelstrom.

A seasoned member of the House of Representatives, Congressman Frank ascended to the Chairmanship of the House Financial Services Committee when the Democrats won control of the Chamber last December. He is smart and has significant clout to go with his fearless style of getting out front on issues, no matter how controversial. “A bill will be filed later this month,” he says.

Frank’s motto is “be prepared”

For the moment he is doing his homework, part of his well-known modus operandi. He explained that he is consulting widely before moving forward with the drafting of legislation which will include but not be limited to a poker carve out from UIGEA. While the Congressman has previously noted, publicly, that he has no plans to work with Alfonse D’Amato on this matter, the former Senator and recently elected Chairman of the Poker Players Alliance has told me, directly, that he and Mr. Frank have at least, “touched base during the past week.”

Perhaps the explanation for the less than enthusiastic embrace of the PPA’s Chairman lies in the Congressman’s openly stated interest in getting some ideas and drafting advice from another former senator from New York, Tom Downey. Mr. Downey, a Democrat from Mr. D’Amato’s neighboring Suffolk County served in Congress from 1974-1993. Since then he has become a highly respected Washington insider as the Chairman of the Downey McGrath Group, Inc.

Congressman Frank is also consulting on big picture issues – relevant to the shot across the brow of UIGEA – with Southern Nevada Congresswoman, Shelley Berkley. Mr. Frank will now lead the charge and is determined to put forth a bill that will stay focused in the Financial Services Committee, according to Ms. Berkley who sounded genuinely excited about the planned cooperation between their two offices.

Berkley has a well-channeled ego

Moments before I left for Europe, last Sunday, Ms. Berkley rang me. We spoke briefly about the changing dynamics in dealing with both the common ground and divergent interests of her poker guys and her casino constituents. She said she was at Mr. Frank’s disposal to assist and to give him important feedback as he moves forward in the development of a bill. She expects to stand shoulder to shoulder with him (she’ll use stilts) in attacking the outrageous provisions of the UIGEA. The present game plan is for the ‘Frank bill’ to go forward before Berkley takes a further look at a study bill that would examine online gaming issues for future purposes.

A poker carve out from UIGEA as a clean separate bill looks as if it is dead as a door nail, but a bigger and more forceful bill is on a well lit horizon; leave it to Congressman Frank to keep it narrow enough to stay tightly within the reins of his committee.

Alfonse D’Amato is poised to zig and zag

PPA Chairman Senator Al D’Amato tells me the political process is inevitably filled with twists and turns. He says he will be staying on top of the situation, and promises to further enlighten me on his advocacy in Washington and recommendations to the poker community so as to enhance the prospects of success. We may see a bill from Frank or Berkley or both, but for sure Alfonse D’Amato will be in the background, pitching the cause of online gaming interests. He has assured the PPA he is going to earn his keep.

CAN D’AMATO SAVE ONLINE POKER?

By Wendeen H. Eolis
Poker Player Newspaper

March 5, 2007

After weeks of protestations that Alfonse D’Amato was only a maybe, today the Poker Players Alliance crows about its catch.

As first reported by Poker Player (February 16th), Senator D’Amato is on board as the Chairman of the PPA, an organization that has set itself up to be the voice of online poker gaming interests. Today, the PPA has been graced with a story in the New York Times that confirms Mr. D’Amato’s presence on the scene. The paper of record is even handed, but not Mr. D’Amato’s best friend in its article. He will undoubtedly soon receive a puffier welcome from another publication the PPA handpicked for an exclusive interview with him.

“When the going gets tough, the tough get going!”


Undeterred by the PPA’s continuing coyness, and the exclusive interview it has reportedly given to a poker journalist who is a member of the PPA Board, I called the organization’s President, Michael Bolcerek last week. I was looking for an update for the same poker community that the PPA wants in its membership ranks. What might be the organization’s battle plans to free online poker from the potential shackles of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Act of 2006? UIGEA attempts to end online betting by American-based players. Mr. Bolcerek was inexplicably tight-lipped about the PPA’s anticipated savior and mum as to its next major steps.

I took my leave from the PPA president’s politely played game of dodge ball, before hopping on an airplane to Washington. While in the Capitol for business matters and a variety of political events on both sides of the aisle, I began to probe the poker industry’s odds of getting relief from the perils of UIGEA.

Multi-tasking in the Capitol

During the course of my visit, I donned many different hats; as business executive, politico, chairman of the government affairs committee of the World Poker Association, part-time poker journalist, and moonlighting poker pro. I saw opportunities to press the flesh as obligations to dig for information on the state of poker, while looking forward to Mr. Bolcerek and his PPA group getting their ducks in a row.

Shelley Berkley: Power Poker Player

All counted, I had more than a dozen meetings with elected officials and political operatives while I was there, but none was more instructive than the one with Congresswoman Shelley Berkley. Congresswoman Berkley welcomed my queries, completely unfazed by my switching hats from one moment to the next. She never grumbled over the fact that I am not a Nevadan. She did point out however, that members of Congress have an overriding duty to pay attention to the voices of constituents. She also stunned me with a simple fact of life in politics: the strength of an association’s voice rests with the number of members that are registered to vote.

In my half hour meeting with the senior member of Nevada’s congressional delegation in the House of Representatives, Shelley Berkley proved to be one smart cookie. She has a thoughtful, no nonsense approach as she considers the issues of her less than synchronized flock of gaming and gambling businesses. She is forthright in her support of her “poker guys.” But not for a minute does she lead me to think she will waver in her substantial commitment to the brick and mortar operators in her district. They were there long before online gaming heated up.

Is a Poker Carve-Out in the cards?

The commercial casino interests are represented by the formidably funded American Gaming Association. Frank Fahrenkopf, a highly regarded and powerfully connected lawyer, is the longtime president of the AGA. He was close to President Ronald Reagan and has represented Wayne (“Mr. Las Vegas”) Newton. He knows the gaming business inside out. Suffice to say Mr. Fahrenkopf’s group has not rushed to the aid of the poker lobby. The gaming industry is behind a study bill for its own purposes. It will soon be introduced in the House of Representatives. Capitol insiders are consistent in saying that poker interests have no real prospect of changing the present course,which is to let a poker carve-out bill fall by the wayside in favor of the commercial gaming industry’s interests in a bill to study the bigger picture of online gaming.

Implied Odds of PPA/AGA Cooperation

It would now seem timely for the PPA to make nice with the AGA, even if it elongates the timetable for relief from the very present strains of UIGEA. Congresswoman Berkley is bent on building cooperation, wherever she can. Will she bring these groups to the table? Can she facilitate a better game plan for both, as the reality of an uphill battle looms for the whole gaming industry? She has not discussed any specifics, but don’t be surprised if Congresswoman Berkley soon makes the effort to promote a meeting of the minds.

Poker Lessons in the Halls of Congress

I left Washington with clear advice for the poker industry; do the homework before skating too fast through the Halls of Congress. And as everyone who was anyone in Washington intoned: count the ways you can support your representatives in the nation’s capitol.

Watch for more bulletins

Stay tuned for more news from my recent Washington travels, and follow up to check out Alfonse D’Amato’s recent visit to the Isle of Man with online poker folks. Poker Stars, which has operations there, is is the most successful online poker site still working the United States market. It is rumored to be moving forward with a scholarly report that will prove poker is a game of skill rather than chance. Now, there’s a plan for the PPA!

Please note this article is substantively the same as the one that wil appear in the next print edition of Poker Player (March 19, 2007).

NO FOLDERS IN LEGISLATIVE GAME

By Wendeen H. Eolis
Poker Player Newspaper

March 03, 2007

Since the passage of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, politics and poker have become inextricably intertwined, far beyond the imagination of legendary New York Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, in the 1959 Broadway musical.

Fiorello’s song of politics and poker is fitting background music for Congresswoman Shelley Berkley. She is the Southern Nevada Congresswoman who is center stage as the entire gaming industry grapples with the impact of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. The UIGEA passed late last year attempts to end online betting by American-based players; Shelley Berkley’s district is filled with brick and mortar casinos and online gamers. She is as outraged by the passage of the legislation as are her diverse constituents within the gaming industry. She has her hands full.

Berkley asks representatives of the PPA and AGA to meet with her

It didn’t take long after the passage of UIGEA for Congresswoman Berkley to understand the difference in the agendas of two distinctly different groups. For the online operators, UIGEA poses immediate economic threats. They seek immediate relief with a bill that provides a poker carve-out from the UIGEA. For the commercial gaming industry, the ramifications of UIGEA are longer term,as the brick and mortar companies evaluate future business plans for online gaming as part of their portfolios. Commercial casino kings seek a bill to study online gaming, with a view toward legalization –against a backdrop of well-thought out regulation.

Two weeks ago, Shelley Berkley, who is poised to introduce the study bill, sent invitations to representatives of online gaming companies and commercial gaming corporations to meet with her in Las Vegas on her home turf. Terry Lanni, MGM’s Chairman of the Board, and Immediate Past Chairman of the American Gaming Association has been a particularly visible player in the online gaming debate and a supporter of the Congresswoman; online honchos have been anxious to get his ear. But he was among those who were absent for the meeting. He explained that scheduled travels precluded his attendance.

Ms. Berkley’s plans for legislative reform in response to the UIGEA would be easier if the brick and mortar casinos and the online gambling operators would work toward pushing one piece of legislation together rather than going off in independent directions. As we go to press, the odds of marrying their interests leave an opportunity for improvement.

The long-established American Gaming Association (AGA) represents the commercial casinos’ interests. The nascent Poker Players Alliance (PPA), reports an estimated three hundred thousand .members and hopes of attracting upwards of a million over the next months. The PPA holds itself out as the voice of online gaming interests with former Senator Alfonse D’Amato reportedly earning big bucks to act as the spokesman for the group. Ms. Berkley speaks of her affection for both segments of the industry. She is hopeful that they will find common ground in the battle to free the entire gaming industry from the shackles of the recently enacted UIGEA.

MGM Chief Lanni speaks out on online gaming

Shortly after the passage of the UIGEA, my longtime friend Terry Lanni chatted with me about the problems that are created as a result of the ACT, not to mention the “ridiculous” events surrounding its unexpected passage.

UIGEA was passed the last night of Congress immediately prior to last year’s mid term elections,as part of a Safe Port security bill,and without any debate in the Senate. Terry, who is extremely well informed about who is doing what to whom in Washington, took me through the political machinations that led to the passage of the UIGEA. He emphasizes that there are no quick fixes in the cards. The MGM/Mirage Chairman remains committed to the legislative posture he led as chairman of the AGA last spring, a bill to study online gaming issues. His mantra: license, tax and regulate. He has said publicly, “If we could add our brand, and the credibility of the publicly-traded United States gaming company, this could be a vast business.”

Shelley Berkley is Lanni’s “favorite Democrat”

Terry Lanni and his colleagues who populate the AGA have met with Shelley Berkley often and have considered a wide range of issues in their discussions,as to the most viable political position for the future of their businesses in the online gaming world. Terry, a high profile Republican who is backing John McCain for presidential nomination, calls his friend Shelley his “favorite Democrat.” He says, with obvious affection, “Shelley Berkley doesn’t take ‘yes’ for an answer.” He adds, “I know a lot of people in Washington who respond to her just to get Shelley Berkley off their backs.”

Just who is Shelley Berkley?

A daughter of immigrants, Shelly Berkley was born in New York City. She was raised in Nevada where her father worked as a waiter, determined to make good. Young Shelley was the first in the family to go to college. She earned her BA degree from the University of Nevada and a JD from the University of San Diego, defraying the costs of her higher education with a waitress job at the Sands Hotel. She always knew she wanted to be in public service. She was elected to the Nevada State Assembly in 1982.

Ms. Berkley later returned to the private sector, going back to her roots at the Sands. She moved up the ladder from her stints as a cocktail waitress and keno runner to become Vice President of Government and Legal Affairs for the casino. She earned more stripes as Chair of the Nevada Hotel and Motel Association. In 1999 she was elected to Congress, and has been re-elected ever since.

Berkley touts her strengths with pride

The Congresswoman is proud of the relationships she has cultivated within the industry and also of the rich knowledge she has gained, from the standpoint of both labor and management. She smiles from ear to ear as she sums up her indisputable status as a key player in the politics of gaming. She says, “I am my parents’ American dream.”

Berkley, the Choreographer

Congresswoman Berkley is outspoken about the travesty of the passage of the UIGEA bill. She is dedicated to her constituents, defending both commercial gaming interests, and her “poker guys,” in their efforts to attack the constraints that have been placed on the online gaming market.

For a while, the PPA publicly fueled hopes for a fast-track legislative bill that would provide a poker carve-out from UIGEA. Reports were flying; Congresswoman Berkley was purportedly poised to do the deed, on behalf of her “poker guys.”

It wasn’t long before AGA president, Frank Fahrenkopf Jr., took PPA president Michael Bolcerek, to task, saying, “No way in hell” to such an idea. He set the facts straight as he saw them. His casino kings were committed to a different bill that will study internet gambling issues. Shelly Berkley acknowledges she made a commitment to the AGA last spring to carry this water up Capitol Hill. She makes herself crystal clear; she has no intention of muddying the water. MGM/Mirage CEO and AGA’s immediate past chairman (2005-2006) Terry Lanni confirms his continued support for the study bill and for his longtime mantra on internet gambling: license, tax, and regulate.

Terry Lanni is a Berkley Fan

AGA members appreciate having Shelly Berkley in their corner. In February, Terry Lanni hosted a fundraiser for the Congresswoman at the MGM “Mansion.” A few days later he told me cheerfully that more than $300,000 had been raised for her coffers. He said it was a tribute to the popularity and respect she has earned. Terry says he has gotten to know his Congresswoman friend over some twenty years. I wanted to get to know her too.

I called Ms. Berkley, asking for a meeting in Washington as part of my research, both to educate my company’s gaming clients as well as for this story. I was a bit afraid my previously publicized affiliations with America’s Mayor and a Republican Governor might turn her off. I secured an appointment easily when I told her that our mutual friend Terry Lanni called her his favorite Democrat, and I was confident she would become my favorite Democrat, too.

Congresswoman Berkley remains centered

While Congresswoman Berkley appeared to be caught between the conflicting positions of the AGA and the PPA, she emphasized this was never the case.

The Congresswoman is as incensed as anyone over the enactment of UIGEA. She is sensitive to the potential economic disaster that could befall the online gaming community, noting that many online operators cannot survive the loss of business that a years-long wait would cause. With that said, however, she advises me her longstanding commitment to her commercial gaming constituents will soon see fruit with a “study bill” introduced through her office. Current plans call for it to be referred to the Judiciary Committee and perhaps others.

Berkley is making her move

Congresswoman Berkley hopes to bring the PPA and AGA into a closer accord, in an attempt to facilitate their cooperativeness in the legislative process. She says, “Communication is the key here.”

She explains her plans to sit down this week with members of the gaming community,from all sides,laying out the issues, and looking into the politics behind these issues. She insists, “This is how progress can be made. I am going to give my best gut feeling about the issues, and let them discuss it amongst themselves with me present.”

While internet gambling companies thirst for an immediate remedy to UIGEA, the savvy Congresswoman slows down the pace, indicating the need for long term organized efforts will have the best chance of overturning the UIGEA of 2006. She offers up the idea that more progress, and a more expeditious resolution is in the reach of the entire gaming industry if the different segments find ways to work more closely together. Will the commercial gaming industry kings now begin to refer to internet gambling sites as online gaming operations?